<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write for Humans First Search Engines Second</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogmarketingjournal.com/2008/10/29/write-for-humans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogmarketingjournal.com/2008/10/29/write-for-humans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://blogmarketingjournal.com/2008/10/29/write-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-7202</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmarketingjournal.com/?p=550#comment-7202</guid>
		<description>Great advice!! I get so tired of getting to a site and every other word is a keyword. It is hard to read and usually is just nonesense. If your content is truly about the keyword subject you have choosen and well written it should do fairly well in search engines without the stuffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice!! I get so tired of getting to a site and every other word is a keyword. It is hard to read and usually is just nonesense. If your content is truly about the keyword subject you have choosen and well written it should do fairly well in search engines without the stuffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://blogmarketingjournal.com/2008/10/29/write-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-7189</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogmarketingjournal.com/?p=550#comment-7189</guid>
		<description>2nd paragraph, 1st sentence:  &quot;...but you can creative&quot;?  Not quite sure, but think that the proofreader may have missed this error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd paragraph, 1st sentence:  &#8220;&#8230;but you can creative&#8221;?  Not quite sure, but think that the proofreader may have missed this error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

